Prominent Donald Trump ally Mel Gibson‘s “lost” gun rights are back in the headlines after the U.S. Justice Department’s pardon attorney claimed she was “fired” over the issue. The current claims have prompted netizens to revisit the matter. So, let’s take a look at why Mel Gibson lost his gun rights in 2011.
Mel Gibson lost his gun rights after conviction in 2011
Mad Max actor Mel Gibson lost his gun rights in 2011 following his misdemeanor domestic violence conviction. According to federal law, nine categories of people are prohibited from owning guns after a conviction. Two of those categories include domestic violence offenses. Therefore, it makes sense that Gibson’s gun rights were revoked in 2011.
However, the 69-year-old actor was allegedly being considered for a “recommendation” on a list of 95 individuals who lost their gun rights due to certain convictions. Elizabeth G. Oyer, the former pardon attorney, has revealed shocking details about the matter, raising concerns over public safety. Gibson’s name has also resurfaced in the discussion.
According to the Times, Oyer received a January letter from Gibson’s lawyer to DOJ officials McHenry and Bove, advocating for the restoration of Gibson’s gun rights. The letter cited Gibson’s “special appointment” by the president and his track record of “big, successful movies” as justification.
Oyer explained to the Times, “Giving guns back to domestic abusers is a serious matter.” She reiterated that it is not an issue that she can take lightly and easily recommend someone. Oyer explained: “Because there are real consequences that flow from people who have a history of domestic violence being in possession of firearms.”
While Oyer’s strong stance considered public safety and existing laws in place, it did not have a positive response. Oyer further alleged that her firm viewpoint against restoring Gibson’s gun rights triggered an alarming confrontation. When she refused to be “flexible,” a senior official under Deputy AG Todd Blanche reportedly transformed from “friendly to condescending to bullying.”
The official then delivered what amounted to a thinly veiled threat, explaining that Gibson’s “personal relationship with President Trump” should be reason enough for her compliance, adding ominously that she “would be wise” to recommend the restoration.
