Many are closely watching the debate over fracking, especially as Vice President Kamala Harris’ stance on the issue evolves amidst the 2024 presidential race. Harris’ position, once firmly against the practice, now reflects a more nuanced approach, highlighting the complex balance between environmental concerns and energy independence. As Harris and Donald Trump clash over this contentious topic, fracking has become a focal point of political discussion.
Here’s a look at Harris’ shifting stance on fracking, Trump’s response, and its impact on the 2024 energy policy debate.
What is fracking and why is it controversial?
Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a method used to extract oil and natural gas from underground rock formations (via BBC).
This process involves injecting high-pressure fluid, composed of water, sand, and chemicals, into shale rock to create fractures, allowing trapped fossil fuels to flow more freely. It has significantly boosted US energy production, making the country a leading producer of oil and gas.
However, it is controversial due to its environmental and health impacts. The process can trigger minor earthquakes and requires vast amounts of water, which strains local resources. It also produces significant wastewater and releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, contributing to climate change. Health risks from chemical exposure near fracking sites have raised further concerns, making it a heated topic in energy policy debates.
What did Kamala Harris say about fracking?
Kamala Harris’ stance on fracking has evolved over time. During her 2019 presidential campaign, she publicly supported banning fracking, aligning with her environmental agenda to combat climate change. “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking,” Harris once said in CNN‘s 2019 climate crisis town hall.
In recent years, Harris’ position has shifted, reflecting the complex political and economic landscape surrounding energy policy. During the recent ABC News presidential debate, Harris clarified that she would not ban fracking and pointed out her role as a tie-breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act, which allowed new fracking leases.
She stressed the need to balance environmental concerns with energy independence and job preservation, underscoring the nuanced approach required in energy policy. It is a contentious issue that highlights the clash between energy needs and environmental concerns.
Harris’ shifting stance reflects the challenges leaders face in balancing energy independence with sustainability. As the US considers its energy future, fracking remains a central topic in managing natural resources and addressing climate change.
